Step three, and nothing is renamed yet This is the ontology Nordbank already has, in their own words, from the tables and the documents on the Sources screen. One relationship in the whole estate is a declared foreign key. Every other arrow was inferred by testing how well the values on each side resolve, so every other arrow needs a person to agree with it.
Their estate as it was read. Nothing renamed, nothing reshaped.
declared key inferred weak, from a document table document
0 of 10 approved Approving an arrow does not map anything to the canonical model. It says this link exists in their estate.
Why an arrow needs approving A resolve rate is evidence, not proof. STOER_MELD.BETROFF_SYS resolves into the inventory for 99.2 percent of rows, identifier against identifier, which is almost certainly a real relationship. Kritischer Geschäftsprozess resolves for 61 percent by matching free text against a system name, which is probably right where it matched and says nothing at all about the other 83 processes. The difference between those two is not in the number; it is in how the number was obtained, and that is what the panel shows before anyone clicks Approve.
Back to sources Map it onto the canonical model